A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted national consideration adhering to an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their family members home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are each very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the internet site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included in detail from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical instant from the lawful timeline.
Within the Main on the dispute Paul Feely is often a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his examination of planning paperwork, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their extensive-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just trying to make a family property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Qualified guidance and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your problem that numerous observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Skilled backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an too much solution.
As the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong over and above that address. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.